Grading tables

The grading tables below allows you as a student to compare your grade with the entire UCLL student population. We make a distinction between Leuven (UC Leuven) and Limburg (UC Limburg) campuses, hence 2 grading tables.

For example, if you have earned a 13 on any of the Leuven campuses, it means that 15.20% of the UC Leuven student population have earned the same grade.

Academic year: 2023-2024

B LEUVEN18

UCLL grade ( out of 20)	ECTS grade	% of graduated students who achieved the grade	Definition
7.0	F	-	FAIL – considerable further work is required
8.0	FX	-	FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
9.0	FX	-	FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
10.0	E	12,88	SUFFICIENT – performance meets the minimum criteria
11.0	D	12,50	SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
12.0	D	14,31	SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
13.0	C	14,91	GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
14.0	C	14,83	GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
15.0	B	11,74	VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
16.0	B	8,92	VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
17.0	A	5,37	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
18.0	A	2,95	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
19.0	A	1,22	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
20.0	A	0,37	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors

UCLL grade ( out of 20) ECTS grade
7.0 F
8.0 FX
9.0 FX
10.0 E
11.0 D
12.0 D
13.0 C
14.0 C
15.0 B
16.0 B
17.0 A
18.0 A
19.0 A
20.0 A

UCLL grade ( out of 20) % of graduated students who achieved the grade
7.0 -
8.0 -
9.0 -
10.0 12,88
11.0 12,50
12.0 14,31
13.0 14,91
14.0 14,83
15.0 11,74
16.0 8,92
17.0 5,37
18.0 2,95
19.0 1,22
20.0 0,37

UCLL grade ( out of 20) Definition
7.0 FAIL – considerable further work is required
8.0 FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
9.0 FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
10.0 SUFFICIENT – performance meets the minimum criteria
11.0 SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
12.0 SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
13.0 GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
14.0 GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
15.0 VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
16.0 VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
17.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
18.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
19.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
20.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors

B HASSELT20

UCLL grade ( out of 20)	ECTS grade	% of graduated students who achieved the grade	Definition
7.0	F	-	FAIL – considerable further work is required
8.0	FX	-	FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
9.0	FX	-	FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
10.0	E	14,57	SUFFICIENT – performance meets the minimum criteria
11.0	D	14,38	SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
12.0	D	15,99	SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
13.0	C	15,77	GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
14.0	C	14,16	GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
15.0	B	10,47	VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
16.0	B	7,33	VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
17.0	A	4,14	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
18.0	A	2,11	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
19.0	A	0,90	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
20.0	A	0,17	EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors

UCLL grade ( out of 20) ECTS grade
7.0 F
8.0 FX
9.0 FX
10.0 E
11.0 D
12.0 D
13.0 C
14.0 C
15.0 B
16.0 B
17.0 A
18.0 A
19.0 A
20.0 A

UCLL grade ( out of 20) % of graduated students who achieved the grade
7.0 -
8.0 -
9.0 -
10.0 14,57
11.0 14,38
12.0 15,99
13.0 15,77
14.0 14,16
15.0 10,47
16.0 7,33
17.0 4,14
18.0 2,11
19.0 0,90
20.0 0,17

UCLL grade ( out of 20) Definition
7.0 FAIL – considerable further work is required
8.0 FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
9.0 FAIL – some more work required before the credit can be awarded
10.0 SUFFICIENT – performance meets the minimum criteria
11.0 SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
12.0 SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant shortcomings
13.0 GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
14.0 GOOD – generally sound work with a number of notable errors
15.0 VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
16.0 VERY GOOD – above the average standard but with some errors
17.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
18.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
19.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors
20.0 EXCELLENT – outstanding performance with only minor errors

Grading table UCLL

UCLL grade ( out of 20	ECTS grade	% of graduated students who achieved the grade	Definition
NA			Student did not sit the exam or did not complete the course
G			Student passed the exam (course without numerical grading)
NG			Student did not pass the exam (course without numerical grading)
GR			No result yet. Result is expected later on
OR			Irregularity has been found

UCLL grade ( out of 20 ECTS grade
NA
G
NG
GR
OR

UCLL grade ( out of 20 % of graduated students who achieved the grade
NA
G
NG
GR
OR

UCLL grade ( out of 20 Definition
NA Student did not sit the exam or did not complete the course
G Student passed the exam (course without numerical grading)
NG Student did not pass the exam (course without numerical grading)
GR No result yet. Result is expected later on
OR Irregularity has been found

UCLL grade ( out of 20
NA
G
NG
GR
OR

Student-led Webinar

Student-led Webinar

Grading tables

Academic year: 2023-2024

UC Leuven

UC Limburg

Grading table UCLL