Grading tables | UCLL

UC Leuven

B  LEUVEN18

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

ECTS grade

% of graduated students who achieved the grade

Definition

7.0

F

-

FAIL – considerable further work is required

8.0

FX

-

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

9.0

FX

-

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

10.0

E

12,88

SUFFICIENT – performance meets the
minimum criteria

11.0

D

12,50

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

12.0

D

14,31

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

13.0

C

14,91

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

14.0

C

14,83

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

15.0

B

11,74

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

16.0

B

8,92

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

17.0

A

5,37

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

18.0

A

2,95

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

19.0

A

1,22

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

20.0

A

0,37

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

ECTS grade

7.0

F

8.0

FX

9.0

FX

10.0

E

11.0

D

12.0

D

13.0

C

14.0

C

15.0

B

16.0

B

17.0

A

18.0

A

19.0

A

20.0

A

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

% of graduated students who achieved the grade

7.0

-

8.0

-

9.0

-

10.0

12,88

11.0

12,50

12.0

14,31

13.0

14,91

14.0

14,83

15.0

11,74

16.0

8,92

17.0

5,37

18.0

2,95

19.0

1,22

20.0

0,37

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

Definition

7.0

FAIL – considerable further work is required

8.0

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

9.0

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

10.0

SUFFICIENT – performance meets the
minimum criteria

11.0

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

12.0

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

13.0

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

14.0

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

15.0

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

16.0

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

17.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

18.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

19.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

20.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

UC Limburg

B  HASSELT20

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

ECTS grade

% of graduated students who achieved the grade

Definition

7.0

F

-

FAIL – considerable further work is required

8.0

FX

-

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

9.0

FX

-

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

10.0

E

14,57

SUFFICIENT – performance meets the
minimum criteria

11.0

D

14,38

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

12.0

D

15,99

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

13.0

C

15,77

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

14.0

C

14,16

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

15.0

B

10,47

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

16.0

B

7,33

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

17.0

A

4,14

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

18.0

A

2,11

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

19.0

A

0,90

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

20.0

A

0,17

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

ECTS grade

7.0

F

8.0

FX

9.0

FX

10.0

E

11.0

D

12.0

D

13.0

C

14.0

C

15.0

B

16.0

B

17.0

A

18.0

A

19.0

A

20.0

A

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

% of graduated students who achieved the grade

7.0

-

8.0

-

9.0

-

10.0

14,57

11.0

14,38

12.0

15,99

13.0

15,77

14.0

14,16

15.0

10,47

16.0

7,33

17.0

4,14

18.0

2,11

19.0

0,90

20.0

0,17

UCLL grade ( out of 20)

Definition

7.0

FAIL – considerable further work is required

8.0

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

9.0

FAIL – some more work required before the
credit can be awarded

10.0

SUFFICIENT – performance meets the
minimum criteria

11.0

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

12.0

SATISFACTORY – fair but with significant
shortcomings

13.0

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

14.0

GOOD – generally sound work with a
number of notable errors

15.0

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

16.0

VERY GOOD – above the average standard
but with some errors

17.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

18.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

19.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

20.0

EXCELLENT – outstanding performance
with only minor errors

Grading table UCLL

UCLL grade ( out of 20

ECTS grade

% of graduated students who achieved the grade

Definition

NA

Student did not sit the exam or did not
complete the course

G

Student passed the exam (course without
numerical grading)

NG

Student did not pass the exam (course
without numerical grading)

GR

No result yet. Result is expected later on

OR

Irregularity has been found

UCLL grade ( out of 20

ECTS grade

NA

G

NG

GR

OR

UCLL grade ( out of 20

% of graduated students who achieved the grade

NA

G

NG

GR

OR

UCLL grade ( out of 20

Definition

NA

Student did not sit the exam or did not
complete the course

G

Student passed the exam (course without
numerical grading)

NG

Student did not pass the exam (course
without numerical grading)

GR

No result yet. Result is expected later on

OR

Irregularity has been found

UCLL grade ( out of 20

NA

G

NG

GR

OR